Kant`s Critique of Judgement analyses our experience of the beautiful and the sublime in relation to nature, morality, and theology. Meredith`s classic translation is here lightly revised and supplemented with a bilingual glossary. The edition also includes the important First Introduction.

Extra informatie: Ingenaaid: paperback,kaft slap Verschenen: september 2008 Gewicht: 337 gram Formaat: 196 x 129 x 32 mm OXFORD WORLD`S CLASSICS

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgement Prijs Euro 17.95   In Winkelwagentje

vergroot omslag

Inhoudsopgave:

Editor`s Introduction		ix
Preface		1	(4)
Introduction		5	(22)
I. Of the division of Philosophy		5	(2)
II. Of the realm of Philosophy in general		7	(2)
III. Of the Critique of Judgment as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole		9	(2)
IV. Of Judgment as a faculty legislating a priori		11	(2)
V. The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgment		13	(4)
VI. Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature		17	(2)
VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature		19	(3)
VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature		22	(2)
IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgment		24	(3)
First Part: Critique of the Aesthetical Judgment		27	(126)
FIRST DIVISION: Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgment		27	(110)
FIRST BOOK: Analytic of the Beautiful		27	(34)
First Moment of the judgment of taste, according to quality		27	(6)
§1. The judgment of taste is aesthetical		27	(1)
§2. The satisfaction which determines the judgment of taste is disinterested		28	(1)
§3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest		29	(1)
§4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest		30	(2)
§5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction		32	(1)
Second Moment of the judgment of taste, viz. according to quantity		33	(7)
§6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction		33	(1)
§7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic		34	(1)
§8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgment of Taste only as subjective		35	(3)
§9. Investigation of the question whether in the judgment of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object		38	(2)
Third Moment of judgments of taste, according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein		40	(14)
§10. Of purposiveness in general		40	(1)
§11. The judgment of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation)		41	(1)
§12. The judgment of taste rests on a priori grounds		42	(1)
§13. The pure judgment of taste is independent of charm and emotion		43	(1)
§14. Elucidation by means of examples		43	(3)
§15. The judgment of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection		46	(2)
§16. The judgment of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure		48	(2)
§17. Of the Ideal of Beauty		50	(4)
Fourth Moment of the judgment of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object		54	(3)
§18. What the modality in a judgment of taste is		54	(1)
§19. The subjective necessity, which we ascribe to the judgment of taste, is conditioned		55	(1)
§20. The condition of necessity which a judgment of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense		55	(1)
§21. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense?		56	(1)
§22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgment of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense		56	(1)
General remark on the first section of the Analytic		57	(4)
SECOND BOOK: Analytic of the Sublime		61	(76)
§23. Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime		61	(2)
§24. Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the sublime		63	(1)
A. Of the Mathematically Sublime		64	(10)
§25. Explanation of the term "sublime"		64	(2)
§26. Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime		66	(5)
§27. Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgments upon the Sublime		71	(3)
B. Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature		74	(5)
§28. Of Nature regarded as Might		74	(3)
§29. Of the modality of the judgment upon the sublime in nature		77	(2)
General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgment		79	(11)
Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgments		90	(47)
§30. The Deduction of aesthetical judgments on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful		90	(1)
§31. Of the method of deduction of judgments of Taste		91	(1)
§32. First peculiarity of the judgment of Taste		92	(2)
§33. Second peculiarity of the judgment of Taste		94	(1)
§34. There is no objective principle of Taste possible		95	(1)
§35. The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgment in general		96	(1)
§36. Of the problem of a Deduction of judgments of Taste		97	(1)
§37. What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgment of Taste		98	(1)
§38. Deduction of judgments of Taste		98	(2)
§39. Of the communicability of a sensation		100	(1)
§40. Of Taste as a kind of sensus communis		101	(2)
§41. Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful		103	(2)
§42. Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful		105	(4)
§43. Of Art in general		109	(1)
§44. Of beautiful Art		110	(1)
§45. Beautiful Art is an art, in so far as it seems like nature		111	(1)
§46. Beautiful Art is the art of genius		112	(1)
§47. Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius		113	(2)
§48. Of the relation of Genius to Taste		115	(2)
§49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius		117	(5)
§50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art		122	(1)
§51. Of the division of the beautiful arts		123	(4)
§52. Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product		127	(1)
§53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts		128	(3)
§54. Remark		131	(6)
SECOND DIVISION: Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgment		137	(16)
§55.		137	(1)
§56. Representation of the antimony of Taste		137	(1)
§57. Solution of the antinomy of Taste		138	(6)
§58. Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgment		144	(4)
§59. Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality		148	(3)
§60. Appendix: Of the method of Taste		151	(2)
Second Part: Critique of the Teleological Judgment		153	(45)
§61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature		153	(2)
FIRST DIVISION: Analytic of the Teleological Judgment		155	(18)
§62. Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material		155	(3)
§63. Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature		158	(3)
§64. Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes		161	(2)
§65. Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings		163	(3)
§66. Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings		166	(1)
§67. Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes		167	(3)
§68. Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science		170	(3)
SECOND DIVISION: Dialectic of the Teleological Judgment		173	(25)
§69. What is an antinomy of the Judgment?		173	(1)
§70. Representation of this antinomy		174	(1)
§71. Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy		175	(1)
§72. Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of nature		176	(2)
§73. None of the above systems give what they pretend		178	(3)
§74. The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable		181	(2)
§75. The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgment		183	(2)
§76. Remark		185	(3)
§77. Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible		188	(5)
§78. Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature		193	(5)
Appendix: Methodology of the Teleological Judgment		198	(46)
§79. Whether teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature		198	(1)
§80. Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose		199	(3)
§81. Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product		202	(3)
§82. Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings		205	(4)
§83. Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system		209	(3)
§84. Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself		212	(2)
§85. Of Physico-theology		214	(5)
§86. Of Ethico-theology		219	(4)
§87. Of the moral proof of the Being of God		223	(4)
§88. Limitation of the validity of the moral proof		227	(5)
§89. Of the use of the moral argument		232	(1)
§90. Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God		233	(5)
§91. Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith		238	(6)
General remarks on Teleology		244

Extra informatie: Ingenaaid: paperback,kaft slap, 253 pagina's Verschenen: september 2005 Gewicht: 272 gram Formaat: 216 x 140 x 19 mm Dover Pubns

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment Prijs Euro 9.95   In Winkelwagentje

Levertijd: 5 tot 7 werkdagen

In Winkelwagentje Share |

Immanuel Kant

Critique of Judgment

Prijs Euro 22.94